Toxine botulique danger word

Many members of the bipartisan coalition that committed the U. to invade Iraq 10 years ago have long since washed their hands of their share of responsibility.In March 2003, a Pew Research Center poll indicated that 72% of the American public supported President Bush’s decision to use force. Bush « lied, » as the common accusation has it, then so did many prominent Democrats—and so did the French, whose foreign minister, Dominique de Villepin, claimed in February 2003 that « regarding the chemical domain, we have evidence of [Iraq’s] capacity to produce VX and yperite [mustard gas]; in the biological domain, the evidence suggests the possible possession of significant stocks of anthrax and botulism toxin.» According to interrogations conducted after the invasion, Saddam’s own generals believed that he had WMD and expected him to use these weapons as the invasion force neared Baghdad.Qui, avec tous ses risques, apporta le premier régime élu démocratiquement, Israël mis à part, du Moyen-Orient …Yet on its 10th anniversary Americans will be told of the Bush administration’s duplicity in leading us into the conflict.The legislation was partly the result of frustration over the undeclared and relatively unheralded « No-Fly Zone War » that had been waged since 1991. According to former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Hugh Shelton, in 1997 a key member of President Bill Clinton’s cabinet (thought by most observers to have been Secretary of State Madeleine Albright) asked Gen. Edward Kennedy put it, « we have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing » WMD. Harry Reid, Tom Harkin, Chris Dodd and Jay Rockefeller.Bush, the War on Terror, and His Critics » (University Press of Kansas, 2012).


hellhole4      
Retour, à la veille du 10e anniversaire du lancement de l’Opération Liberté pour l’Irak et avec le professeur du United States Naval War College Stephen F.